The recent surge in popularity of OpenAI's ChatGPT has led to numerous attempts to trademark variations of the GPT acronym, prompting OpenAI to seek trademark protection for the term. Let us analyze the complexities surrounding OpenAI's efforts to secure a trademark, as well as the potential implications for the company and its competitors.

The Growing Popularity of ChatGPT and its Implications

OpenAI's ChatGPT success

OpenAI's ChatGPT has gained remarkable popularity since its introduction, making the company a household name. The chatbot, based on OpenAI's deep learning model, GPT-4, has attracted a large user base and significant media attention. As a result, other organizations have attempted to capitalize on this success by creating their own GPT-based services and applying for trademarks with names such as ThreatGPT, MedicalGPT, DateGPT, and DirtyGPT.

OpenAI's trademark application

In response to the numerous GPT-related trademark applications, OpenAI filed for a trademark on the term "GPT" in late December. The company requested the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) expedite the process due to the proliferation of potential infringements and counterfeit apps. However, OpenAI's petition was dismissed as it failed to pay an associated fee and provide the required documentary evidence.

The Complexities of Securing a GPT Trademark

The trademark application process

The trademark application process is inherently complex and time-consuming. In OpenAI's case, the USPTO's dismissal of their petition means the decision could take up to five more months. Furthermore, the outcome remains uncertain, as OpenAI may face challenges based on the descriptive origin of the "GPT" acronym, which stands for "Generative Pre-trained Transformer."

Public Perception and Opposition

Even if the USPTO examiner approves OpenAI's application, it will enter an opposition period, during which other market participants can argue against the "GPT" trademark. The opposition may challenge OpenAI's claim that "GPT" is proprietary and perceived as such by the public, rather than representing generative AI more broadly. Establishing public perception would require costly research or evidence of how "GPT" has been used in the public domain, such as in late-night talk shows and public writing.

The Implications for OpenAI and Its Competitors

OpenAI's potential success in securing a trademark

Despite the challenges, OpenAI has several factors in its favour when it comes to securing a trademark. The company has been using the "GPT" acronym since the release of its original GPT-1 model in 2018, and its recent success has increased its brand recognition significantly. If OpenAI can establish that "GPT" is a famous trademark, the company would be able to prevent its use by others more broadly.

The Risks for Competitors and the Future of the GPT Landscape

If OpenAI succeeds in securing a trademark for "GPT," competitors looking to create GPT-based services may face legal risks. This could potentially stifle innovation and limit the development of new applications and services utilizing GPT technology. On the other hand, OpenAI's trademark protection may serve as an incentive for competitors to develop unique and distinctive brands, fostering a more diverse and innovative AI landscape.

The Precedent of OpenAI's GPT-3 Trademark

Successful registration of the GPT-3 trademark

It is important to note that OpenAI already holds a trademark registration for GPT-3, which did not face any registration refusal on the grounds of likelihood of confusion or descriptiveness. This previous success suggests that the company's attempt to trademark "GPT" may have a stronger foundation than initially apparent. The fact that the USPTO did not object to the GPT-3 trademark could be seen as an acknowledgment of the distinctiveness and uniqueness of OpenAI's specific generative AI model.

Implications for the current GPT trademark application

The existence of the GPT-3 trademark might provide additional support for OpenAI's current application to trademark "GPT." Given that the company has already been granted a trademark for a specific iteration of its technology, it could argue that the broader term "GPT" also warrants protection. This precedent may serve as valuable evidence for OpenAI as it navigates the trademark application process and seeks to establish the distinctiveness and proprietary nature of the "GPT" acronym.

Impact on the opposition's arguments

The success of the GPT-3 trademark may weaken the opposition's arguments against OpenAI's current application. Since the USPTO has previously approved a GPT-related trademark, the opposition may find it more difficult to assert that the term is too descriptive or that it pertains to generative AI more broadly. This could ultimately tilt the outcome of the trademark battle in favor of OpenAI and further solidify its position in the AI industry.

OpenAI's Strategies and Possible Outcomes

Learning from the past

It appears that OpenAI may have been caught off guard by the sudden success of ChatGPT and the ensuing trademark rush. This experience can serve as a lesson for the company to be more proactive in protecting its intellectual property. OpenAI has already taken steps in this direction by attempting to register a related trademark in China, where it has not yet launched ChatGPT.

Impact on OpenAI's Brand and public recognition

As the trademark application process continues, the publicity surrounding OpenAI's efforts to secure a trademark for "GPT" could further strengthen its brand recognition. If the company successfully establishes "GPT" as a famous trademark, it would enjoy protection extending far beyond its sphere, potentially deterring competitors from using similar acronyms or names.

The Broader Implications for the AI Industry

Encouraging innovation

While OpenAI's potential trademark victory might pose challenges for competitors, it could also encourage greater innovation in the AI industry. Companies would need to differentiate themselves from OpenAI and create distinct, creative brands to avoid legal risks. This could lead to the development of new technologies and applications, ultimately benefiting the AI community as a whole.

Balancing competition and collaboration

The trademark battle highlights the delicate balance between competition and collaboration in the AI industry. OpenAI's GPT technology has its roots in the Transformer architecture introduced by Google researchers in 2017. As AI research continues to advance at a rapid pace, fostering a collaborative environment that promotes knowledge sharing is crucial to the industry's overall progress. Securing trademarks can help protect companies' intellectual property while also motivating them to develop unique solutions, ultimately striking a balance between competition and collaboration.


OpenAI's attempt to secure a trademark for "GPT" showcases the complexities and challenges inherent in the trademark application process. The outcome of this trademark battle will have lasting implications for OpenAI, its competitors, and the broader AI industry. By fostering innovation and promoting a balance between competition and collaboration, the AI community can continue to advance and develop groundbreaking technologies that benefit society.

Share this post